Women bishops: The Church of England votes 'no'

Women bishops: The Church of England votes 'no'
Hooray! That's what many people thought when Rowan Williams was made the Archbishop of Canterbury. Why? Well sure, even if you're an atheist you can see this guy has got some pretty good ideas. But for many, the great thing was that he was for women bishops.

Women bishops: The Church of England votes 'no'

Women bishops. Yep, that's right. They're different to men bishops. Different in one specific way - they don't exist. Because believe it or not, in this day and age when (almost) everyone has realised that women are just as great as men, women are still not allowed to be bishops.
But today (Tuesday 20 November) that was all set to change as the Church of England - or to be more precise it's legislative board the General Synod of the Church of England - gathered to vote on this issue. To finally put their hands up and say: "Oops, sorry guys, yeah we bad, we totally shouldn't discriminate against people based on their sex."
It's a bit of a no brainer right? And to add to that, the man taking over from Rowan Williams next year, Justin Welby, has also got his head screwed on and thinks that women should be allowed to be bishops.
That's why it was such shocking news when it was revealed today that the synod has decided that no, women cannot be bishops! It is, in our opinion, an absolutely ridiculous decision.
A church divided
Now it would be very easy to dismiss the whole of The Church of England as old, backwards, conservative women haters. But before you do that, take a look at the stats.
The Synod is divided into three sections - the House of Clergy, the House of Bishops and the House of Laity. For a vote to get through, a two thirds majority was needed in each.
Over two thirds of the House of Clergy and Bishops voted for women bishops, but it was the House of Laity that said no.
But it's even closer than that, the House of Laity voted 132 against women bishops, 74 for - if just 6 more people had voted for women bishops this would be a very different story (in fact, the House of Clergy voted 148 for, 45 against.)
An embarrassment

After about 12 years of debating this issue, many within the church say that this decision is a national embarrassment and does not represent the church. It certainly makes it easier for outsiders to mock The Church of England.
MPs have even said that this makes it even harder for them to defend the idea of bishops having seats in the House of Lords.
What now?
The House of Bishops are holding an emergency meeting to work out if there is anything they can do to deal with this legislature. If they don't achieve anything, it's another three years.
It's a shocking blow for The Church of England and rightly so - an institution that doesn't allow people a position based on their sex is out dated, unusual and down right embarrassing.

Published by Sophie Herdman
20 Nov 2012
Special offers...
Our partners
Advertising


Don't miss...
100 Friendship Quotes Every BFF Needs To HearThe Ultimate To Do List: The Top 100 Things To Do In Your Lifetime
100 Of The Best Quotes To Live Your Life ByInspirational Feminist Quotes: Empowering Quotes For Women
Latest… 18/09/2014
Women in Focus News
Guides
Videos
How To Be More Assertive At Work: 13 Hacks You Need To Know
The Girl Code: 23 Things Every BFF Should Know
Why All Women Should Remember Reeva Steenkamp
Why You Need An iPhone 6: 20 Reasons We're Addicted To The iPhone
All Women in Focus news
Changing your name | How to change your name
Getting a mortgage | a quick guide to getting a mortgage
Work for yourself - get your small business online
How to deal with redundancy
See all Women in Focus guides
Teaching kids about money
See all Women in Focus videos
 

Don't miss out!

...Join our newsletter
Get the sofeminine latest straight to your inbox
  OK
Find us on...