A sweeping anti-fraud drive is on the way, promising tighter checks, a phased rollout, and new technology policing benefit rules.
Starting in 2026, ministers plan to let banks flag potential benefit ineligibility to the Department for Work and Pensions. The push uses automated data checks to spot rule breaches before overpayments build, with a nationwide rollout expected by the end of the decade.
What is changing and when
Under the Public Authorities (Fraud Error and Recovery) Bill, the DWP intends to use bank-held data to spot signs that a customer’s circumstances may clash with benefit rules. The approach begins from April 2026 and will expand through a “test and learn” programme, with a full rollout forecast between 2029 and 2031.
From April 2026, banks will use automated flags — not human snooping — to signal possible breaches such as savings over £16,000.
Today, the DWP generally asks a bank for detailed information only when it already suspects fraud. The new regime flips that logic by allowing banks to run periodic checks against objective “eligibility indicators” and send alerts where something looks off. If a flag triggers, the DWP can open an inquiry and request more information.
Which payments are in scope
Officials say the focus sits on means-tested rules, but eight payments are expected to come within scope of the new checking powers. These include widely claimed benefits and support paid to carers and disabled people, where separate entitlement rules apply.
- Universal Credit
- Pension Credit
- Housing Benefit
- Income Support
- Jobseeker’s Allowance (income-based)
- Employment and Support Allowance (income-related)
- Carer’s Allowance
- Personal Independence Payment
For means-tested benefits, the checks will look for signals such as capital limits being exceeded. For non-means-tested support, flags may relate to other conditions, such as residency or overlapping income that affects entitlement.
The £16,000 savings limit for Universal Credit is expected to be a central trigger for bank alerts.
How the checks will work
The eligibility verification notice
The DWP will issue Eligibility Verification Notices (EVNs) to banks and building societies. Each EVN lists specific indicators to check across accounts receiving DWP benefits. Banks compare the indicators against the information they already hold and return a simple “match/no match” signal. Only if a match appears will the DWP ask for more detail.
Red flags banks may detect
- Balances that appear to exceed capital thresholds for means-tested benefits, such as the £16,000 rule for Universal Credit.
- Patterns suggesting extended absence abroad that could clash with residency rules.
- Regular income flows that may signal undeclared work or a change in household finances.
- Multiple accounts receiving the same benefit, hinting at duplication or administrative error.
Crucially, banks are not expected to share full transaction lists by default. The initial screening focuses on indicators, not your day-to-day purchases. If an alert triggers, the DWP can investigate, ask you for evidence, or correct payments before debts build up.
What happens if you get flagged
If your account triggers an alert, the DWP may contact you for documents, pause a payment to verify details, or adjust future awards. Where an overpayment is found, the department can seek recovery. Ministers have also discussed faster routes to collect certain debts directly, though any such step would require legal safeguards and parliamentary approval.
You can challenge decisions, submit evidence, and request mandatory reconsideration if you disagree with an outcome. Claimants retain data rights, including the ability to ask what information is held and to correct inaccuracies.
Officials stress the system targets errors and fraud early, aims to reduce false positives, and shares minimal data unless a flag is triggered.
Privacy, safeguards and oversight
The DWP says it will use a phased rollout to calibrate indicators, measure error rates and embed safeguards. Independent oversight and audits are expected. Banks will receive clear legal instructions on data minimisation, retention periods and security. The government says vulnerable customers should be protected from undue harm, with processes adapted as evidence emerges.
Campaigners have raised concerns about privacy, potential overreach, and the risk of automated systems making mistakes. Ministers counter that the approach protects taxpayers, guards genuine claimants by preventing large debts, and focuses on objective signals rather than broad surveillance.
Timeline at a glance
| Period | What to expect |
|---|---|
| April 2026 | Pilot EVNs begin with selected banks; narrow set of indicators tested |
| 2026–2029 | Expanded trials, more banks, refined indicators, external scrutiny |
| 2029–2031 | Full national rollout if tests meet legal, accuracy and fairness standards |
What you can do now
- Track your savings. If they approach £16,000, check how this affects your benefit claim.
- Report changes promptly. Moving in with a partner, new work, inheritances or extended travel can alter entitlement.
- Keep records. Bank statements, wage slips and correspondence help resolve queries quickly.
- Set banking alerts. Many apps can warn when balances cross chosen thresholds.
- If flagged, respond quickly. Provide documents and ask for a written explanation of any decision.
- Seek independent advice if unsure. A trained adviser can model entitlement and repayments.
Worked examples
A saver hits the capital limit
Chris receives Universal Credit and saves diligently. A bonus and a small inheritance push savings to £16,400. The bank’s system flags a potential clash with the UC capital rule. The DWP asks Chris for recent statements. After reviewing dates, the department suspends one monthly payment, then reduces entitlement. Because Chris reported the change promptly, any overpayment is small and repaid over time.
Long trip abroad during a claim
Nadia claims Pension Credit and stays with family overseas for several months. The bank data shows prolonged spending outside the UK linked to the account receiving benefit payments. The DWP writes to confirm travel dates. Nadia supplies return tickets and medical notes explaining the extended stay. The department decides no penalty applies but adjusts future payments to align with the absence rules.
Key risks and potential benefits
- Risks: false alerts causing stress, administrative delays, and confusion about complex rules.
- Potential benefits: fewer long-running overpayments, quicker correction of mistakes, and a clearer focus on objective eligibility tests.
If you juggle multiple accounts or share finances, consider keeping a simple spreadsheet of balances and transfers. A clear record helps show which money is yours, which is someone else’s, and when thresholds were crossed.
Running a quick entitlement check with a benefit calculator can highlight how savings, earnings and household changes alter your award. Simulate a future scenario — for example, a £2,000 gift or three months abroad — to see how to stay within the rules before a real-world change triggers a costly correction.



Can someone explain whether the “match/no match” check includes ISA balances or only current/savings tied to benefit payments? What happens if your balance briefly jumps over £16,000 for a day due to a transfer, then drops immediatley? Is there a grace period before UC is paused?